Comments on: 2 > 1 http://duality.quadoshock.com/archive/2005/02/26/2-1/ 0 Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:43:55 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: Lloyd Nebres http://duality.quadoshock.com/archive/2005/02/26/2-1/#comment-17 Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:39:00 +0000 http://duality.quadoshock.com/archive/2005/02/26/2-1/#comment-17 I'm sure this will be answered in the (pending) About section, but why a duo-log? What's your rationale (and I mean for both of you, not just you alone, Quad) for engaging in a two-author weblog? This is a non-trivial question in this sense: I had no idea this other person even existed (I don't remember you mentioning him in your weblog, or if you did it was fairly infrequent), much less had a weblog of his own. This is obviously a radical departure from the usual, and a very intriguing one. Not a new idea, though... but the implementation is (so far) terrific, which is to be expected. Other similar weblogs were Trev/Anna's Rivutana, long ago, and more currently David and his friend's. The latter's still alive and hopping. Anyway, congratulations on this newest evolution. Looks very interesting already. But your pal better be writing as frequently as you do, else it'll look strangely imbalanced. ;p I’m sure this will be answered in the (pending) About section, but why a duo-log? What’s your rationale (and I mean for both of you, not just you alone, Quad) for engaging in a two-author weblog? This is a non-trivial question in this sense: I had no idea this other person even existed (I don’t remember you mentioning him in your weblog, or if you did it was fairly infrequent), much less had a weblog of his own.

This is obviously a radical departure from the usual, and a very intriguing one. Not a new idea, though… but the implementation is (so far) terrific, which is to be expected. Other similar weblogs were Trev/Anna’s Rivutana, long ago, and more currently David and his friend’s. The latter’s still alive and hopping.

Anyway, congratulations on this newest evolution. Looks very interesting already. But your pal better be writing as frequently as you do, else it’ll look strangely imbalanced. ;p

]]> by: Kass http://duality.quadoshock.com/archive/2005/02/26/2-1/#comment-16 Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:28:28 +0000 http://duality.quadoshock.com/archive/2005/02/26/2-1/#comment-16 The free version of MovableType doesn't enforce the one author only thing, just FYI. :P This is feeling unfortunately slow. Is it me or your host or what? The free version of MovableType doesn’t enforce the one author only thing, just FYI. :P

This is feeling unfortunately slow. Is it me or your host or what?

]]> by: J.Liu http://duality.quadoshock.com/archive/2005/02/26/2-1/#comment-15 Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:45:41 +0000 http://duality.quadoshock.com/archive/2005/02/26/2-1/#comment-15 1) WordPress is totally free. 2) MoveableType free version only allows for one author. We need two. 3) WordPress installation is soooo easy. 1) WordPress is totally free.
2) MoveableType free version only allows for one author. We need two.
3) WordPress installation is soooo easy.

]]> by: Kass http://duality.quadoshock.com/archive/2005/02/26/2-1/#comment-14 Sun, 27 Feb 2005 08:12:41 +0000 http://duality.quadoshock.com/archive/2005/02/26/2-1/#comment-14 Only one question and I'm sure you saw this coming. Why WordPress over MovableType? :P Only one question and I’m sure you saw this coming. Why WordPress over MovableType? :P

]]>